Missile Weapon Ranges and how they have changed
We were playing our Monday game, and the subject of weapon ranges came up, we were outside and range became important. So I got to looking and studying the weapon ranges and I couldn’t figure out what I was looking at. I was studying my old handbook, the 2e manual with the Warrior on the horse, and was just amazed at how crappy and bad the ranges were. First we talked about how this was listed, if its by feet or meters, but we figured that it must be yards. I tried to find the answer but wasn’t able to at the time.
A sample listing was Dagger, 1/2/3 which baffled me. I can throw a knife more accurately then that! And a spear had the same thing. WHAT?!?!
So, we settled on yards, or 3 feet, which was also wrong, but it got me interested in how range works in the different books that I have.
Advanced Dungeons and Dragons
Axe, hand: 1/2/3
Bow, composite, long: 6/12/21
Bow, composite, short: 5/10/18
Bow, long: 7/14/21
Club: 1/2/3
Crossbow, heavy: 8/16/24
Crossbow, light: 6/12/18
Dagger: 1/2/3
Dart: 1½ /3/4½
Hammer: 1/2/3
Javelin: 2/4/6
Sling (bullet): 5/10/20
Sling (stone): 4/8/16
Spear: 1/2/3
This is the original 1st edition. These scores are terribly inaccurate.
Advanced Dungeons and Dragons 2e (1989 print)
Arquebus: 5/15/21
Blowgun: 1/2/3
Comp. Long bow, flight arrow: 6/12/21
Comp. Long bow, sheaf arrow: 4/8/17
Comp. Short bow: 5/10/18
Long bow, flight arrow: 7/14/21
Longbow, sheaf arrow: 5/10/17
Short bow: 5/10/15
Club: 1/2/3
Hand crossbow: 2/4/6
Heavy crossbow: 8/16/24
Light crossbow: 6/12/18
Dagger: 1/2/3
Dart: 1/2/4
Hammer: 1/2/3
Hand axe: 1/2/3
Harpoon: 1/2/3
Javelin: 2/4/6
Knife: 1/2/3
Sling bullet: 5/10/20
Sling stone: 4/8/16
Spear: 1/2/3
Staff sling bullet --/3-6/9
Staff sling stone --/3-6/9
There are more weapons added, and the Dart was streamlined to make it easier to use, but the numbers are all still confusing. There are no hints about what units we are talking about on this page.
Advanced Dungeons and Dragons 2e (1995 print)
Arquebus: 50/150/210
Blowgun: 10/20/30
Comp. Long bow, flight arrow: 60/120/210
Comp. Long bow, sheaf arrow: 40/80/170
Comp. Short bow: 50/100/180
Longbow, flight arrow: 70/140/210
Longbow, sheaf arrow: 50/100/170
Short bow: 50/100/150
Club: 10/20/30
Hand crossbow: 20/40/60
Heavy crossbow: 80/160/240
Light crossbow: 60/120/180
Dagger: 10/20/30
Dart: 10/20/40
Hammer: 10/20/30
Hand axe: 10/20/30
Harpoon: 10/20/30
Javelin: 20/40/60
Knife: 10/20/30
Sling bullet: 50/100/200
Sling stone: 40/80/160
Spear: 10/20/30
Staff sling bullet: --/30-60/90
Staff sling stone: --/30-60/90
Now, THIS is an improvement. This list even states above it that the stated numbers are in yards. So this would mean that all of the stats listed in the previous editions were listed in tens of yards. Why they couldn’t state this on the charts themselves I honestly have no idea.
PLAYER’S OPTION: Combat & Tactics (also printed in 1995, but complete in 1994)
Arquebus: 10/20/60
Blowgun: 2/4/6
Comp. Long bow, flight arrow: 12/24/42
Comp. Long bow, sheaf arrow: 8/16/34
Comp. Short bow: 10/20/36
Club: 2/4/6
Hand crossbow: 4/8/12
Heavy crossbow: 16/34/48
Light crossbow: 12/24/36
Dagger: 2/4/6
Dart: 2/4/8
Hammer: 2/4/6
Hand axe: 2/4/6
Harpoon: 2/4/6
Javelin: 4/8/12
Knife: 2/4/6
Sling bullet: 10/20/40
Sling stone: 8/16/24
Spear: 2/4/6
Staff sling bullet: -
Staff sling stone: 6/12/18
Out of curiosity, I also included the rarely used and often forgotten handbook of optional rules. This is just a sampling, much more is listed in the book, and is for some odd miniatures rules, and one has to turn to a page prior to find that this is measured in squares, each square equaling 5 feet. Where they got these numbers from I have no idea. Perhaps from the Battle System which came out years and years ago, that I’ve never played neither.
* * *
Looking over the numbers, I see, once again that the reprint which came out in 95 is clearly the better book. The odd thing about it was that I refused to get it, and when I had to buy a Player’s Handbook, I always avoided the reprint. I prefer how the original is laid out, and absolutely LOVE the art inside, but as far as information goes, the winner, at least in this comparison.
I am interested in knowing what 3.0, 3.5, and 4th editions vary from the tables show. Are they the same, or better organized? I just don’t have access to that information.
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
|
Labels:
money and equipment
|
-
GG PDFs OK, Secret Doors, Sanity Mechanics - The issues concerning the PDFs have been resolved, so clicky clicky on those RPGNow and Your Games Now links up there on the right and purchase The Grindin...1 hour ago
-
AP: Beyond the Breach Session 6 (Burning Wheel) - This entry is part 6 of 6 in the series Beyond the BreachI’m pathetically late on posting this AP – the actual session took place in October but various ot...10 hours ago
-
The Paladins of Dwimmermount - Lots of gamers make the claim that the paladin class, first introduced to OD&D in Supplement I, doesn't fit well with the other classes. While I certainly ...10 hours ago
-
Let Slip the Dogs of War, Part III - This posting is the third in a three-part series which explores how a Dungeon Master (DM) can apply accepted axioms of war to enhance the structure and mas...12 hours ago
-
New Dark Ages group - online? - There's been a fair amount of discussion about the Google Wave service and RPGs over the past few days, especially on the forums. I've had the pleasure of ...15 hours ago
-
[RPG] Character Generation, Urutsk-style pt. I - - I've taken to heart those of you who asked that the rules set reflect the Urutskan feel the background depicts. The previous week and this are dedicated to...1 day ago
-
Give Them What They Want... - Over at RPG.net, Old Geezer asks: One of the things computer games have going for them is QUICK rewards. In an interview about Diablo, one of the designer...1 day ago
-
Jumping on the Bandwagon - I just wanted to say that I freaking love Hexographer. This is the first fantasy/campaign mapping software that hasn't caused me to lose interest after ten...1 day ago
-
A Milestone of Sorts - Wait! Stop the presses, batten down the hatches, and roll out the barrel! Monsters & Manuals has 100 *blogger* followers; the d20s are on me! Thank you eve...1 day ago
-
Words - I can be peculiar when it comes to using words. Some might even consider my predilection for using certain words properly as snobbish. Take the word “aweso...1 day ago
-
The Hand in the Wall - Over at *Frankensteinia*, *Pierre* is celebrating *Boris Karloff’s* 122nd birthday by throwing a weeklong *Blogathon* (Nov. 23rd -29th) in his honour. *Pie...2 days ago
-
Cross-Class Training: GMs, Teachers & Managers - As many of you know, I’ve spent most of the last week preparing a 2 day MS-Outlook 2007/Time Management course that I’ll be teaching Tuesday and Wednesday...2 days ago
-
five links, nano-review edition - Malevolent & Benign - You'd think I'd be really into a book full of shiny new 1st edition monsters, but this thing is just too wordy. Every time I go to re...3 days ago
-
Wouldn't THAT be cool! - I've been playing Dragon Age Origins on my Xbox 360. I like the game. I don't LOVE the game, but I think it's certainly entertaining and has some replay v...1 week ago
-
-
Systems of Reward - I was just talking with a buddy at work about systems of reward in gaming. I think we started talking about video games but he is the friend I made the Zig...1 week ago
-
Go Hunting - I haven't felt like blogging much lately. I was on vacation this week and figured I would pound out a dozen entries, but that never happened. I've been tak...1 week ago
-
The Prisoner - in RPG form? - Ok, so I've been away for quite some time here. Just crazy times around here, with lots going on. Anyway, I'm getting geared up for "The Prisoner" - AMC's...1 week ago
-
Dream Cover...N C Wyeth - What if NC Wyeth had illustrated the original classic fantasy role playing game? If there is an illustrator who has influenced modern fantasy art more than...2 weeks ago
-
Checking In - Since it’s been a month since my last post, I thought I’d at least throw something up here today. In the past month, I have done zero gaming. Zip. Zilch. N...2 weeks ago
-
-
The Halloween Game Teaser - I'll be posting a copy of my Halloween adventure notes on here probably by tomorrow in case other DMs wish to use it as well. Buuuuut, as a teaser to both ...3 weeks ago
-
Too many Gods - Too many gods you say?? You bet your sweet bippe, especially in 2nd edition AD&D, yes you could limit the pantheon(s) the players got to choose from for se...1 month ago
-
Hiatus but... - QuasarDragon will be going on hiatus for an indeterminate amount of time. However, I will still be sending links to SF Signal so please check them out for f...2 months ago
-
The Anime Nebraskon Super Battle Frenzy BBQ - The Anime NebrasKon people have done it again. Sunday, August 30th, they will be hosting another Fan BBQ in Elmwood Park: The Anime Nebraskon Super Battl...3 months ago
About Me
- Ripper X
- I enjoy writing, and have played since 1993. I'm married to my best friend, with two children. Favorite Character Class: THIEF
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(119)
- ► October 2009 (6)
- ► September 2009 (4)
-
►
August 2009
(14)
- Chapter I: The Goblin
- New Project to begin soon
- Reversing as Story Element
- Medusa Cactus
- Low Level Adventures & Monster Treasure
- Villisca Axe Murder
- Exploring Specialized Fighting Styles
- Plants, Dangerous: Fear Weed
- Societies and Factions in the D&D World
- Different Fighting Styles for Different Classes
- Thief Skills for the Masses
- More 2e Love
- RPG Blog Carnival: Conventions, Ren Fairs, Carniva...
- Books as Treasure
-
▼
July 2009
(15)
- Personal Gaming Style
- And Now A Message From The Blogger
- Revitalizing Old Monsters
- Creating a Meaningful Festival
- Handedness?
- I Attack The Darkness!
- Missile Weapon Ranges and how they have changed
- Add-In #09: Hoo Doo Lady
- Sunday Supplemental: Flintlock Weapons
- Clerics & Priests in AD&D
- Blog Carnival: D&D My first games
- Monstrous Compendiums
- New/Old Monster: Rock Reptile
- Myth as Adventure
- Open For Business
- ► April 2009 (15)
- ► March 2009 (14)
- ► February 2009 (5)
- ► January 2009 (10)
-
►
2008
(74)
- ► December 2008 (3)
- ► November 2008 (4)
- ► October 2008 (5)
- ► September 2008 (4)
- ► August 2008 (4)
- ► April 2008 (18)
- ► March 2008 (5)
8 comments:
Yeah, it was a really strange holdover from the old miniatures rules that ranges were listed in inches which you had to convert to tens of feet underground and tens of yards above ground - it about drove me nuts back in the day...
3E used Range Increments. In 2E you had no penalty up to the first Range number, then -2 up to the second, then -5 up to the third.
In 3E they just had one range number. A bow might be 100 feet? I forget exactly. But for every full range increment you suffer -2. So a weapon with range 30 fired at someone 100 feet away would be at -6 to hit. And as I recall the maximum range was x10, though it might have been x5 for thrown weapons (sounds like we houseruled that though).
Problem solved! Thanks Pastor Bill, I find your reply deeply interesting, and it does answer a lot of questions about how they arrived at these strange numbers.
Thanks for commenting Timeshadows, I take it that that is the ranges for the new classic system that you're working on?
Anonymous, I appreciate you adding this data. I don't have access to it, and I was interested on how it varied with the older editions. I'm such an old fart that I find much of 3e to be completely beyond me.
Negative.
I just didn't want to drag the books out.
--Here it goes:
Range Increment-
* Dagger: 10'
* Club: 10'
* Shortspear: 20'
* Spear: 20'
* Crossbow, Heavy: 120'
* Crossbow, Light: 80'
* Dart: 20'
* Javelin: 30'
* Sling bullet: 50'
* Axe, Throwing: 10'
* Hammer, Light: 20'
* Trident: 10'
* Longbow: 100'
* Long-Composite: 110'
* Shortbow: 60'
* Short-Composite: 70'
* Sai: 10'
* Bolas: 10'
* Hand Crossbow: 30'
* Crossbow, Hvy. Repeating: 120'
* Crossbow, Lgt. Repeating: 80'
* Net: 10'
* Shuriken: 10'
^ At or less than the above: No penalty
^ Each Overage iteration: -2
^ Thrown weapons have a 5x max. Increment
^ Projectile (bows, etc.) 10x max. Incr.
That's 3.5's PHB Ranges
Thanks Timeshadows, I'm surprised that nobody else jumped on this, considering how many times I've been told that I should be playing 3.5.
These numbers are even more interesting, I find them harder to understand and it would take longer to calculate for me. Plus, why would the ax be improved, but the dagger didn't?
I just never realized this stuff before. Thanks again:)
You're welcome, Ripper X,
Whatever you're most familiar with... :)
My guess why the axe would be better than the dagger is due to its Heft. A heavier object (but not too heavy) travels further due to Momentum, once its Inertia is overcome. That's my story and I'm sticking with it. :D
I am aware of a single peculear stat from our own mortal mundane world that hasn't changed over time. At times of the war of the roses, a British archer was required to fire 12 arrows in 60 seconds at a target 150 yards away and seven of those had to hit. Modern minimum qualification for an infantry man are approximately the same - fire 12 shots from an assault rifle at a human silhouette target 150 yards away and a minimum of seven shots ahve to hit. Small change for a footsoldier except that it is easier to kill people and to keep them alive thanks to miracles of modern technology. Another fascinating statistic: When Ancient Romans were invading British Isles whenever they were doing it, the casualty ratios of Roman legionnaires to whoever was fighting against them in the British Isles was approximately 1:19. Amazingly, approximately the same ratio was achieved by the US troops in Vietnam in firefights with the VCs and NVAs. This is just from firefights. Other forms of attack (air bombardment, artillery, traps) made casualties higher for both sides.
In so far as it affects my D&D game, I tweaked the range table for the Longbow to have its Long range start at 151 yards. And all the other rangers were tweaked accordingly. I did the same thing for the Crossbow, I don't remember off hand, but it may have dropped for some, definitely dropped for the Chinese Repeating Crossbow down to 45 yards (actual range achieved by the real world Chinese repeating crossbows).
Post a Comment