1 day ago
Mechanic Series: THAC0 & Armor Class
One flips through gaming books and sees all of these numbers
and hears complex terms like COMBAT MATRIX, descending armor class, combat
modifiers. The deal is that it is harder to talk about math than it is to just
solve the problem. None of the math problems that we’ll have to solve during
play will involve any tool more advanced than a basic calculator, and everybody
can use a calculator! Once you get going with the system it forms an algorithm
and players can quickly do the math in their head, as it isn’t anything that
you don’t do every day anyway.
THAC0 simple means, “To Hit Armor Class 0” When the second edition
included this as core, it revolutionized the game, sort of. It was always kind
of there, but what it allowed was for us to write down just one number on our
character sheets and this would help us figure out what we needed to roll to
hit a target regardless of how challenging the target was to hit.
Inventing a system this easy to use took a lot of testing
and tinkering, prior to Dungeons and Dragons, the game’s inventers played
wargames, and one always had to come up with a system which randomized if a hit
was successful or not in a fast and concise manner. Dice proved a great
universal method. Once we figure out a system, then we have to figure out how
to describe the system so that others can use it as well, which since math is
never changing, math is the best way to figure all of this stuff out.
Prior to the THAC0 system, the game designers created Combat
Matrixes, tables that when rolled against, told you if you hit or not, some of
these were more complex than others, but they all strove to achieve the same
goal, the more universal the better.
We get the term Armor Class from Wargames as well,
specifically Naval Combat where different ships had different amounts of armor
to protect them, players found that a descending armor class was more
functional in the game than ascending Armor Class systems, but in Naval Combat,
the ships AC never changed, the same goes for all mass combat systems, so when
Gygax wrote the Chainmail Rules, he used a universal Armor Class system shared
by all of the troops in a battalion.
When it came to D&D, the terminology was kept, and we
have the AC system, but instead of a fixed number, the number for an individual
target isn’t constant. A ships ability to hit another ship always stayed the
same, but with individuals we wanted to simulate improvement, this required
some additional thinking, and more complex combat matrixes.
In the first edition of AD&D, players wanted lots of
ways to fight and modify things to make an opponent either easier or harder to
hit depending upon choices that each player made. The AD&D system kept this
matrix hidden from player view by putting it in the DMG, you rolled the dice
and the DM told you if you hit or not. This provided a mystery because you didn’t
know how the DM achieved this target number, as the DM wanted to keep all of
the stats secret. It didn’t work, players caught on to the formula, either from
sneaking a peek at the DMG or just playing enough to realize the DM’s system.
This also required even more work on the DMs part, and users were coming up
with their own methods of changing it up to make it easier for them to come up
with a universal system that could still be modified quickly.
Detractors instantly rejected this method, saying that it
dumbed down the game, and others claiming that it made combat too difficult to
figure out. 2e was still learned, not by yourself and on your own, but by
playing the game with others who had been taught by somebody else who already
knew how to play the game. If one looks at the THAC0 system by itself, it can
be confusing, but all it takes is the player sitting next to you to help you
figure out if you hit or not for a couple of sessions before it is permanently
implanted in your brain in a way that will never go away . . . ever.
In third edition, they changed descending AC to ascending AC
which really threw 2ers for a loop. You play with this system enough it becomes
ingrained in you and even something as simple as making AC 1 as bad is enough
to throw you off, so I know that going back to a descending AC is the same way
for others, just know that us holdouts didn’t refuse to move on to 3e because
of ascending AC, when it comes down to it, 3e is too ridged of a system when
you get used to the freedom that earlier editions allow.
So what is the formula? Well, it is easy. Look at the THAC0
grid, and find the number you need for your level. This number never changes,
it doesn’t float around, and it is always the same. When you have a modifier
you don’t apply it to your THAC0, you apply it to your opponents Armor Class.
Thus, a sword+3 doesn’t change your THAC0, it changes your opponent’s AC from 4
to 7. Penalties also change your opponents AC, if you have a -2 to your roll,
you take it from his AC, which turns an AC of 4 to an AC of 2.
Simple yet elegant, isn’t it! Suddenly all of the complaints
that it requires to much math are dismissed. The problem wasn’t the system; the
problem was that people kept trying to modify their THAC0 numbers.
Once you get it figured out, and can start playing with more
advanced rules, the THAC0 system still functions. Now you can have missile
combat and melee combat taking place in a forest at the same time using the
same ruleset without having to change anything. The floating AC rule allows
combat to flow smoothly and naturally so that both sides can focus on play
without having to get all technical.
IS THE THAC0 SYSTEM BROKEN?
Broken, no; subjective, very. If you up and decide to use a
different method of deciding how combat is resolved, then you aren’t playing
AD&D. Taking it out makes all of the other rules in the AD&D system not
work anymore, period. The game encourages you to tinker with the AC system,
applying modifiers as you see fit to factor in advantages and disadvantages
depending on where exactly each battle is taking place. Can you get carried
away with modifiers? You bet! And the AD&D system will let you do this, but
the DM can always decide exactly how many or how few of the optional rules and
modifiers work best for their particular game.
We had to go here, I hope that I was able to clear up some
confusion about how the THAC0 system is supposed to work, because it isn’t this
mechanic that weakens the game, but what LOTS of people do with it that does,
which we can now explore.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
My Blog List
-
The Great North - Visual Delights - In the background, quietly, as my Yoon-Suin 2nd edition projects nears final fulfilment, work has been going on in relation to The Great North. Behold, s...
-
25 Years Ago I Posted My Wish List For D&D. How’s it Going? - At Gen Con in 1999 Wizards of the Coast revealed plans for a third edition of Dungeons & Dragons, scheduled for release in 2000. The upcoming release would...2 days ago
-
-
Star Trek Video Games With Mat Bradley-Tschirgi – Episode 280 – 10/23/2024 - Shane Plays Geek Talk Episode #280 – 10/23/2024 Star Trek Video Games: An Unofficial Guide to the Final Frontier with author Mat Bradley-Tschirgi. There ...4 weeks ago
-
The Unbiased Review - Let the Machines do it! (AI review of ORWELL @2081) - *Hey folks. There's still a pulse in the old blog, if a weak one. I barely get to write nowadays due to being a (relatively) new parent. It's been intens...
5 weeks ago -
Modena Play che trasloca a Bologna e i Settembre dell'Innocenza (Stand by me) - *"Non riuscirò mai ad andarmene da questo posto, vero Gordie?"* *"Puoi fare tutto, basta volerlo."* *(Stand by me - Ricordo di un'estate)* Salve a Tutti, ...
1 month ago -
The Mystery of the First Blackmoor Map - In this POST from a few years ago, I was concerned with the issue of scale and distance in Blackmoor in the course of which I attempted to determine the...
2 months ago -
Grimdark vs. Eucatastrophe - Noisms has some interesting ideas in this post about his desire for some depth to his grimdark, and turns to Gene Wolfe and Tolkien for relief. Now, it ...
5 months ago -
Attronarch's Athenaeum - Over at the forum El Borak mentioned Attronarch in his thread Hirelings, loyalty, and morale which you should take a look at. Attronarch has a website Att...8 months ago
-
Last move - to self-hosting! - As my vote regarding Substack in the “marketplace of ideas”, I’m moving to self-hosting. I’m now at (and hopefully staying for a long time at) Blog: ht...10 months ago
-
Sex-Crazed Falling Stars, Free Weather Magic, and Adventures: News of the Hill Cantons - *Grandma Gaya, the Rav-Witch of High Kezmarok*, seeks the stout of limb and humble of mind in the *obtaining of fallen stars* from an upcoming prophesied ...
10 months ago -
Thanks for your comments, friends! - Dear friends and followers of the blog, Thanks for all your comments over the years. When Google+ opened, I decided to jump on board. Everything got coupl...1 year ago
-
GUARDIANS OSR Superhero RPG- DC Heroics House Rules - It's been a rough year with sickness. But here I am. Let's go. Guardians is a fun little game from Night Owl Workshop games. They have a lot of fun OS...
1 year ago -
Coming Fast! 50th Anniversary of OD&D January 2024 (OGL comments) (& how Wizbro is stupid) - The 50th Anniversary, the 50th Birthday of OD&D is approaching and will be here in January 2024. Wizards of the Coast, instead of preparing for something s...1 year ago
-
Original Dungeons & Dragons Has Its 50th Anniversary In January 2024 (Feb 2023) - The countdown to the 50th Anniversary of the Original Dungeons and Dragons in January 2024 continues. Give the drama with Wizards during January 2023, it...1 year ago
-
I'm In!! The monthly posting challenge leadup to the 50th Anniversary of OD&D in 2024 - I am inspired by this post found here, to be part of the monthly posting during 2023 and 2024 to highlight the 50th Anniversary of OD&D. We were challeng...1 year ago
-
It's been a decade, now... - This is a tough time of year for me. So, with your indulgence, here's this link to a post I did a decade ago... EDIT: I have no idea why it didn't take. S...2 years ago
-
This Blog is now on Indefinite Hiatus - Greetings, I haven’t been able to post except sporadically for a while. I just found out I will need to find a new place to live within the next few months...3 years ago
-
Ind of the Year - The Colors of Magic - On December 1st, there will be a nice bundle of small, indie itch RPGs from around the world called the *Ind of the Year Bundle 2020* that includes *The Co...
3 years ago -
Be The DM, 1 - OK, I've run plenty of games and I've talked with and read the thoughts of many other DM's. One thing is certain; No two DM's are the same. I have seen ...4 years ago
-
The Crowning of King Harold - Here is a spooky story that comes from my latest novel, Lions Red and Gold, available now in digital and dead tree only on Amazon. I post it here in ho...
4 years ago -
MIDLANDS CHARACTER GENERATION - Character development (of Player via imagined formative experiences) in my dog in DMing. Placyer character development is a huge part of my sandbox. I use ...4 years ago
-
Lake Geneva Original RPG Campaign: Merlynd the Magician: A Remembrance of Don Kaye, ... - Lake Geneva Original RPG Campaign: Merlynd the Magician: A Remembrance of Don Kaye, ...: LINK to Description and Ordering: https://www.tlbgames.com/colle...4 years ago
-
Character Concepts: Planescape pt 3 - Part 1 Part 2 Continuing my series on oddball Planescape Faction Personalities... Harmonium Sidby the Stick (LG/halfling/fighter) - Sidby's a good enough b...5 years ago
-
D&D Sling Damage vs. Large Targets - In many early editions of D&D, weapons were assigned two damage values: one for small/medium targets (i.e. man-sized) and one for large targets (giants and...
5 years ago -
Announcing the Contest Winner! (Plus Some Interesting US Coin Facts) - The third semi-annual Save Versus All Wands contest - What is the Value of this Coin Hoard - is over. $1,000 was the winning guess, only a bit below the ...
6 years ago
Links to Suggested Stuff
6 comments:
Thanks Chris! But do make sure that you remember that if one of those preppy popular kids ask you if you are playing one of those complex math games, then it is your DUTY to always say, "Yes!", and if he still wants to play then you must string him along as long as possible.
"Gygax [...] dismissed [it] as too simple."
If there's one thing Gary didn't like, it was simplicity. :-)
That may be an inaccurate statement that I made, I can't tell you too much. I know that he touches upon it in the 1e DMG, but by the time Gygax got to sit down and write the DMG the MM had already been in print for a couple of years. Talking about THAC0 could had just been a nod to a mechanic that was too late to implement.
This stuff was before my time, I was just a little kid. What I'd like to know is how in the hell did anybody play AD&D without the Combat Matrix? The MM was published one year, than the PHB the next, the DMG was last to be written, and it contains most of the info that makes the game playable. My only guess is that there must had been a combat matrix in the first printing of the MM.
Hey, Rip! You further defined me as a FIRST Edition AD&D DM! I don't confuse my players with game mechanics, they need to have uncluttered minds to make decisions and interact with the hell that I put them into!
I am not a fan of Gygax or a hater of Simplicity, however, if you want your game to reflect realism, and be reflect the real world tactics that is line how medieval weapons were developed and used, your game will get nuanced and more complex! Personally, I don't want to be figuring out the 'rithmetic, while DMing. What I do instead is have a set of To Hit and To Be Hit numbers written on my copy of the player character's sheet, already prefigured with all of the modifiers. One line for each melee weapon, 1H and 2H use line for the bastard sword, and three lines for each missile weapons - at different ranges. This way, I see the number I need based on what the player tells me, I roll and call it without having to do any math. I use a lot of modifiers - Weapon vs armor table, I added a few tweaks to make combat more tactically relevant in a direction different from the Combat and Tactics.
Realism and D&D are two very different things, especially when it comes to combat, but I get what you are saying. Either you are a fan of the THAC0 system, or you aren't. Me personally, I can't use a combat matrix, I don't like them and I never have. I can work with the THAC0 system much faster, I already know my THACO, just give me the modified AC and I can tell you if I hit or not.
I personally have developed a deep love for math, but calculating THAC0 isn't complex enough to even be called math. But I get it! I do. It is a preference thing, but the cool thing about it is that you and I can play the same game with two different tables and come out with relatively the same results regardless of the method that we are using, so you are correct, using the 1e matrix system instead of THAC0 doesn't break the game down, it is still functional.
Oh no, Ripper, I bring the Combat in all its mortal glory to my D&D players. Consider this: Combat is non-linear, meaning that any injury can be fatal. I see fear in my players' eyes every time they go into battle. I have am elegant mechanic for determining, if a critically injured character remains on his feet; and if he remains conscious after an arrow pierces his chest, before bleeding out. I use a hit location table, but not for damage, rather to see of the armor will avert a critical hit. Armor is very expensive and warriors have to spend money and seek out master armorer and accumulate good armor piece meal. If you got a solid metal piece protecting the area, then nothing under sixth level can deal a death blow with natural weapons through a solid metal armor. Players can develop their unique fighting style by trial and error, that matches historical experience.
I don't use THAC0, because there are a set of static modifiers to hit, and then there are tactical modifiers that apply to the to hit roll based on characters' actions in battle, and, if they use the weapon in accordance with the purpose, for which is was developed, they get a tactical advantage - Unseating riders, trapping and pulling shields from melee opponents, etc. If I want to learn the players something, I have their opponents use the tactic on players.
I also make my D&D game realistic in terms of consequences of their decisions, that players face in the game.
The chief benefit of all this house-ruling is that players are forced to think, and that power games are rendered impotent. They have to get into the game to be able to perform. This style of DMing evolved, when I got a group of outsiders to gaming, wbo all wanted to play fighters (they had a pretty sound logic - simplest character type that they can understand, and therefore, control). I decided to make playing fighters in my game as interesting, as it is to play thieves and magic-users.
1e Matrix suits me better, but I see the advantages of using THAC0.
Post a Comment