The Ives Method of Stat Checks
I love attribute tests. Players are always trying to do weird stuff, and the DMG says that everything, no matter how ignorant or seemingly impossible, should have a percentage chance of success, however they really don’t give you any ideas about how to arrive at these magic numbers.
Now then, the very first issue of Dragon Magazine Wesley D. Ives had written a marvelous article about how to arrive at these percentages, a system that is more time consuming, but at the same time, a bit more interesting then my current way.
My current way of determining if a character can do something or not is to have them roll an ability check. Say, a Player’s INT is 14, and their WIS is 12, if I wanted to find out how perceptive a character is, I’d have them add up their INT and WIS, then divide by 2. (14+12=26, 26 ¸ 2 = 13) Then we check this number against a d20. The chances of seeing cool stuff is way to good.
Ives’ system is a bit more complicated, but, like I said, it makes things somewhat more unsure then just having to roll under a 13 on a d20, especially since there are too many players that think that all of their stats need to be 18’s straight across the board.
DEFINING ATTRIBUTESSTRENGTH: Any extraordinary physical activity.
CONSTITUTION: All questions of stamina; swimming, running, staying awake, going hungry, etc.
DEXTERITY: Manual manipulation of devices, balance and climbing, tying/untying knots, etc.
INTELLIGENCE: Discovering proper method of operating all mechanical devices, including all magical devices; Discerning patterns, deducing cause and effect, recognizing types of lairs, learning new languages and skills, etc.
WISDOM: Divining “correct path“ of action, recognizing functions of devices, etc.
CHARISMA: Believability, persuasiveness, morale of followers, etc.
IVES’ METHOD OF DETERMINING THE TARGET NUMBER
Whenever a character attempts to do an action that would tax his abilities, and isn’t covered by the NONE-WEAPON PROFICIENCY rules, we’ll have the character generate a number between 1 and 100, this number will be the Target Number, or what he needs to role below with a percentile dice.
The first thing that we need to do is: 1. Generate a number from 1-100, and consult the table below. We’ll roll the dice, and add the characters ability in question to the result.01-20: d4
21-40: d6
41-60: d8
61-80: d10
81-00: d12
2. Using the type of die called for, generate a number, and multiply this number by the amount of the attribute being tested. This number is the percent chance of success.
Lets try it out. Lardbutt is a barbarian who wants to smooth talk a saucy tart. Lardbutt’s CHA is a very stout 4, thus we’ll roll a d100 and we get a 24, adding his awesome CHA score will give us a 28. Checking the number against our handy dandy little chart, which tells us to roll a d6. Lardbutt roles a 2, so we will multiply 2 and his CHA, which gives us a 8% chance of Lardbutt being able to smooth talk the lady without getting slapped for his trouble.
Lets try it again. Lardbutt finds this cool contraption parked against the side of the road. He looks at it and he ponders its purpose. Now, Lardbutt the Barbarian has a WIS of 6. He rolls up a 45 on a 1d100, giving him a score of 51. The chart says to roll a d8, which he does and gets a 7. We multiply 6 and 7, thus our Target Number is 42. Lardbutt has a 42% chance of figuring out that the contraption that he is looking at is a Catapult, and somehow, the thing will throw the large rock that is loaded into the basket.
It’s that simple! Of course it isn’t perfect, especially with feats of Strength, you’ll still probably want to use the Open Doors, and Bend Bars/Lift Gate method of solving those riddles, but for all of those questionable things that we aren’t sure what will happen, this is a workable system!
Wednesday, October 01, 2008
|
Labels:
Ability Scores,
Miscellany,
Proficiencies
|
- campaign ideas
- NPC's
- combat
- Miscellany
- encounters
- rants
- Ripper's Gaming Sessions
- monsters
- money and equipment
- Reviews
- pc classes
- magic
- Proficiencies
- Treasure
- Time and Movement
- Sunday Supplemental
- experience
- campaign add-ins
- Alignment
- races
- Mechanic Series
- vision and light
- Ability Scores
- wizard spells
- Supplemental
- priest spells
My Blog List
-
Kezmarok, Counting Houses, and Amazon Battle-Barges: Recent News from the Hill Cantons - And now the news from the Hill Cantons… The great half-ruined southern metropolis of Kezmarok is back in the shouted news of Cantonal town criers with...4 days ago
-
Update to Hommlet / 3d Printing post... - I finished printing out and assembling the first two rooms of the Moat-house dungeon, on Sunday night. This was just to get a feel of how things work and...4 days ago
-
pledge allegiance - *Booty and the Beasts* is a 1979 monster and treasure book from Fantasy Art Enterptises. Art by Erol Otus, text by Otus, Mathias Genser, and Paul Reiche ...6 days ago
-
New Wotc D&D Survey - New Wotc D&D Survey I enjoy filling these out and telling them things they don't want to hear.1 week ago
-
Analysis of Causes of PC Death in OSR Games - In my previous post, I mentioned that in my weekly campaign we average around one PC death a month. In the comments somebody asked me about the causes of...1 week ago
-
Arnesonian Time Keeping - The original Blackmoor game as Dave Arneson ran it between 1971 and 1975 may be described as a living world campaign. - that is, the world moves through ...1 week ago
-
Betrayal at Krondor 30th Anniversary & Fan Film Challenge with Neal Hallford – Episode 266 – 3/14/2023 - Shane Plays Geek Talk Episode #266 – 3/14/2023 Hey there, friend! If you’re into classic games and fascinating stories, you’ll love our latest podcast ep...1 week ago
-
How Shadowdark Delivers Old-School D&D Intensity With Modern Game Mechanics - The Shadowdark game by Kelsey Dionne of The Arcane Library bills itself as delivering old school gaming with modernized mechanics. Shadowdark hardly rates ...1 week ago
-
You Should be Watching Emergent GM - This guy packs more in a two-minute video than most others manage in 20+ minutes.1 week ago
-
REVIEW: Of Dice And Men - *Let's try a new thing. It will be a variety of "I read a book and talk about it", the difference being: I'm not doing it alone. My good friend Eric Diaz...2 weeks ago
-
Coming Fast! 50th Anniversary of OD&D January 2024 (OGL comments) (& how Wizbro is stupid) - The 50th Anniversary, the 50th Birthday of OD&D is approaching and will be here in January 2024. Wizards of the Coast, instead of preparing for something s...1 month ago
-
Original Dungeons & Dragons Has Its 50th Anniversary In January 2024 (Feb 2023) - The countdown to the 50th Anniversary of the Original Dungeons and Dragons in January 2024 continues. Give the drama with Wizards during January 2023, it...1 month ago
-
I'm In!! The monthly posting challenge leadup to the 50th Anniversary of OD&D in 2024 - I am inspired by this post found here, to be part of the monthly posting during 2023 and 2024 to highlight the 50th Anniversary of OD&D. We were challeng...2 months ago
-
Gli Sproloqui del Grognardo: il Cacciatore di Regolamenti - Ciao, capita anche a voi quando passate vicino alla libreria dove rimangono – ordinatamente e in bella mostra - i manuali con i quali avete giocato negli...7 months ago
-
The Cultist, The Torturer, and the Slaver classes for OSR Sword & Sorcery Games. - Why these three classes? Honestly because I'm bored in my medical retirement and I want a few classes besides my Barbarian, Brute, etc builds to run my Swo...8 months ago
-
It's been a decade, now... - This is a tough time of year for me. So, with your indulgence, here's this link to a post I did a decade ago... EDIT: I have no idea why it didn't take. S...1 year ago
-
This Blog is now on Indefinite Hiatus - Greetings, I haven’t been able to post except sporadically for a while. I just found out I will need to find a new place to live within the next few months...1 year ago
-
Alignment and Lawful Clerics - This is the third in a series of web log posts where I describe what “alignment” must mean in the Perilous Realms, based upon our group’s tone and play-s...1 year ago
-
Ind of the Year - The Colors of Magic - On December 1st, there will be a nice bundle of small, indie itch RPGs from around the world called the *Ind of the Year Bundle 2020* that includes *The Co...2 years ago
-
Be The DM, 1 - OK, I've run plenty of games and I've talked with and read the thoughts of many other DM's. One thing is certain; No two DM's are the same. I have seen ...2 years ago
-
The Crowning of King Harold - Here is a spooky story that comes from my latest novel, Lions Red and Gold, available now in digital and dead tree only on Amazon. I post it here in ho...2 years ago
-
MIDLANDS CHARACTER GENERATION - Character development (of Player via imagined formative experiences) in my dog in DMing. Placyer character development is a huge part of my sandbox. I use ...2 years ago
-
Lake Geneva Original RPG Campaign: Merlynd the Magician: A Remembrance of Don Kaye, ... - Lake Geneva Original RPG Campaign: Merlynd the Magician: A Remembrance of Don Kaye, ...: LINK to Description and Ordering: https://www.tlbgames.com/colle...3 years ago
-
Character Concepts: Planescape pt 3 - Part 1 Part 2 Continuing my series on oddball Planescape Faction Personalities... Harmonium Sidby the Stick (LG/halfling/fighter) - Sidby's a good enough b...3 years ago
-
D&D Sling Damage vs. Large Targets - In many early editions of D&D, weapons were assigned two damage values: one for small/medium targets (i.e. man-sized) and one for large targets (giants and...3 years ago
-
Announcing the Contest Winner! (Plus Some Interesting US Coin Facts) - The third semi-annual Save Versus All Wands contest - What is the Value of this Coin Hoard - is over. $1,000 was the winning guess, only a bit below the ...4 years ago
Statcounter
Contact me at Ripx187@gmail.com
Search This Blog
Blog Archive
-
►
2018
(5)
- ► October 2018 (1)
- ► September 2018 (1)
- ► April 2018 (1)
- ► February 2018 (1)
- ► January 2018 (1)
-
►
2017
(39)
- ► November 2017 (1)
- ► September 2017 (3)
- ► August 2017 (2)
- ► April 2017 (6)
- ► March 2017 (5)
- ► February 2017 (5)
- ► January 2017 (4)
-
►
2016
(58)
- ► December 2016 (4)
- ► November 2016 (6)
- ► October 2016 (5)
- ► September 2016 (4)
- ► August 2016 (4)
- ► April 2016 (4)
- ► March 2016 (4)
- ► February 2016 (4)
- ► January 2016 (7)
-
►
2015
(24)
- ► December 2015 (6)
- ► November 2015 (7)
- ► October 2015 (7)
- ► September 2015 (4)
-
►
2010
(14)
- ► March 2010 (5)
- ► February 2010 (5)
- ► January 2010 (4)
-
►
2009
(123)
- ► December 2009 (3)
- ► November 2009 (4)
- ► October 2009 (6)
- ► September 2009 (4)
- ► August 2009 (13)
- ► April 2009 (15)
- ► March 2009 (14)
- ► February 2009 (5)
- ► January 2009 (10)
-
▼
2008
(73)
- ► December 2008 (3)
- ► November 2008 (4)
- ▼ October 2008 (5)
- ► September 2008 (4)
- ► August 2008 (4)
- ► April 2008 (18)
- ► March 2008 (5)
6 comments:
So exactly what does this system have over the usual "GM guesses"? Does it somehow feel more interesting because you follow an official method and it involves more dice rolls? I'm not sold on why this system is so damn good.
I don't know about you, but sometimes I literally have no idea how to rule a situation fairly. For situations like that, this system is perfect! I also thought it to be historically interesting. This thing was developed before Proficiencies were, and quite possibly, are a direct link to their inclusion to later editions.
I'm not a big fan of codified systems for dealing with on-the-fly activities by the PCs. I'd rather just eyeball it on the spot and come up with some mutually agreeable way to resolve its success or failure. I'm also not a big fan of treating ability scores as being a major, let alone primary, determining factor in how successful such activities are. One of my biggest beefs with the transition from OD&D to AD&D is the greater emphasis placed on ability scores.
I suppose that it depends on how you started playing the game. The first MOD I ran was Night of the Walking Dead, and it showed me how to incorporate ability scores into a game, I've done it ever since!
Abilities, to me, are more important then just getting a better to hit number, or telling a player the level of Wizard spell that he can cast, they also show us how well the character gets along in the world around him. The stat check is just my way of keeping a player on his toes, and in some cases, forcing players to roleplay when they choose to ignore their stats.
I've been going with the certain number of dice against an ability score method. Usually d6s (3,4 or 5) depending on the difficulty of task and if the characters background gives any examples. This method is fast and the players can argue about whether a task is made too difficult which keeps me honest.
Abilities, to me, are more important then just getting a better to hit number, or telling a player the level of Wizard spell that he can cast, they also show us how well the character gets along in the world around him.
It's a perfectly defensible approach; it's just a late approach in the history of D&D, being a late 1e innovation. For myself, class is more important than ability scores, which is why it's the important factor in helping me decide whether a given character is able to do something successfully or not.
It's a question of taste primarily, though there's the historical angle too. As I said, I think AD&D -- and Greyhawk before it -- made a mistake by over-emphasizing the mechanical importance of ability scores. It was the first tentative step on the road that led us to 4e and I'd just as soon go down a different path.
Post a Comment